Poor dog

A place to talk about anything (that doesn't belong in the other forums).

Moderator:Æron

User avatar
Gizensha
Posts:1753
Joined:Sun Feb 22, 2004 12:27 am
Location:Blackpool, UK
Contact:

Postby Gizensha » Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:07 am

<a href='http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/mers ... 527374.stm' target='_blank'>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/mers ... br><br>I'm hoping animal rights activists will pick up on this and call for a reduction in the amount of use sniffer dogs get, but even if there is I doubt it'll go through. Poor dog <!--emo&:(--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... ns/sad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad.gif' /><!--endemo-->
SirQuirkyK: GSNN argued that Unanonemous is to sociologists what DoND is to statisticians
Gizensha Fox: ...Porn?
Livejournal, Greatestjournal

User avatar
Sky
Posts:69
Joined:Wed Jul 07, 2004 3:21 am
Location:Colorado
Contact:

Postby Sky » Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:13 am

Thats a shame.
<img src='http://img75.exs.cx/img75/2082/rubyskyb5rv.gif' border='0' alt='user posted image' />

User avatar
norsenerd
Posts:2269
Joined:Tue Oct 14, 2003 2:42 pm
Location:Lost
Contact:

Postby norsenerd » Wed Aug 04, 2004 7:03 am

I'm blaming the people who requre there to be plice snifer dogs.<br><br>Drugs are just one big huge problem.
Llewellyn for President 2008 <br><br><img><br><img>

User avatar
VisibilityMissing
Posts:1278
Joined:Mon Jun 14, 2004 8:31 pm
Location:Oak Park, near Chicago, Illinois

Postby VisibilityMissing » Wed Aug 04, 2004 1:31 pm

<!--QuoteBegin-Gizensha+Aug 4 2004, 01:07 AM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Gizensha @ Aug 4 2004, 01:07 AM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> <a href='http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/mers ... 527374.stm' target='_blank'>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/mers ... br><br>I'm hoping animal rights activists will pick up on this and call for a reduction in the amount of use sniffer dogs get, but even if there is I doubt it'll go through. Poor dog <!--emo&:(--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... ns/sad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad.gif' /><!--endemo--> <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> Unfortunately, accidents like this can very easily happen. The way they train these dogs is to associate the smell of the drugs to a toy or to food. The animal will eagerly seek out what it thinks is a good thing, and if unattended ingest the poison.<br><br>Sniffer dogs have their place, though. They're also trained to find disaster victims and dead bodies. <br><br> Until technology gives us something better, I'm afraid the risk will have to continue.
"The beauty of this is that it is only of theoretical importance,
and there is no way it can be of any practical use whatsoever."
- Sidney Harris


"Perhaps they've discovered the giant whoopee cushion I hid
under the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge." http://ozyandmillie.org/2002/01/03/ozy-and-millie-819/

User avatar
Gizensha
Posts:1753
Joined:Sun Feb 22, 2004 12:27 am
Location:Blackpool, UK
Contact:

Postby Gizensha » Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:55 pm

What? So robotics is good enough to stop humans going into potentially hazardess environments but not dogs? <!--emo&:(--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... ns/sad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad.gif' /><!--endemo--><br><br>...OK, so admittedly I'm not sure how good a sense of 'smell' a robot can be forced to have, but still. What the heck was a sniffer dog left unattended for, anyway? That's just stupid considering, as you said, the way they're trained.
SirQuirkyK: GSNN argued that Unanonemous is to sociologists what DoND is to statisticians
Gizensha Fox: ...Porn?
Livejournal, Greatestjournal

User avatar
norsenerd
Posts:2269
Joined:Tue Oct 14, 2003 2:42 pm
Location:Lost
Contact:

Postby norsenerd » Wed Aug 04, 2004 9:42 pm

How can you atended to a dog 100% of the time?
Llewellyn for President 2008 <br><br><img><br><img>

User avatar
Ozymandias
Posts:1901
Joined:Sun Jun 20, 2004 3:21 pm

Postby Ozymandias » Wed Aug 04, 2004 10:02 pm

getting a robot to "smell" would be very hard and expensive. I see nothing wrong with the use of sniffer dogs so long as they are being watched by a handler to make sure that they dont take the substance in. I think that for the greater good it is better for 1 dog to die than for one drug pusher to make lots of money, and have loads of, say, medical students overdosing. I know it sounds harsh, and if there was a way of finding drugs as effectively as without sniffer dogs, then I'd fully support the discontinuation of drugs sniffer dogs (the ones for tracking lost ppl or murders or whatever could still remain), even if the new method was a bit more expensive. Its not like i, or the police, want to see dogs dying unnecessecarily
The end is nigh!

User avatar
Gizensha
Posts:1753
Joined:Sun Feb 22, 2004 12:27 am
Location:Blackpool, UK
Contact:

Postby Gizensha » Thu Aug 05, 2004 5:59 am

<!--QuoteBegin-norsenerd+Aug 4 2004, 09:42 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (norsenerd @ Aug 4 2004, 09:42 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> How can you atended to a dog 100% of the time? <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> At least in this country, a sniffer dog normally has a handler who stays with it constantly while it's on duty... The handler being an officer specially trained in... Attending to sniffer dogs, getting any materials found off of them, etc.
SirQuirkyK: GSNN argued that Unanonemous is to sociologists what DoND is to statisticians
Gizensha Fox: ...Porn?
Livejournal, Greatestjournal

User avatar
norsenerd
Posts:2269
Joined:Tue Oct 14, 2003 2:42 pm
Location:Lost
Contact:

Postby norsenerd » Thu Aug 05, 2004 4:39 pm

Yes but 100% is alot.
Llewellyn for President 2008 <br><br><img><br><img>

User avatar
Gizensha
Posts:1753
Joined:Sun Feb 22, 2004 12:27 am
Location:Blackpool, UK
Contact:

Postby Gizensha » Thu Aug 05, 2004 5:12 pm

But required in various professions and specialisations. "Now before I put you under for your heat transplant, I'll freely admit that I get a nervous twitch in my writing arm during these operations 5% of the time. Good night."<br><br>OK, somewhat exagerated example, but.. What's the acceptable level of risk?<br><br>And I'm not meaning to come accross as insensitive to people here (I mean, I openly accept that sniffer dogs are, regrettably, needed at the current level/expense of robotics (the comment about robotics was partially out of not being sure at what level 'sense of detecting chemicles in the atmosphere (which is, essentially, what an animal's sense of smell is) and partially a knee-jerk reaction)), I'm just slightly annoyed by the whole thing.<br><br>Also, I am aware from experience at demonstration events and tv reports of how close the specialists who work with police dogs and the dogs are, so... Oh I don't know what I'm trying to say here... Sorry. <br><br>I'm going to post this partially incoherrant babble that seemed to lose it's point half way through in case any one can help me figure out what I was trying to say in the first place, and in case it helps people know what I mean....
SirQuirkyK: GSNN argued that Unanonemous is to sociologists what DoND is to statisticians
Gizensha Fox: ...Porn?
Livejournal, Greatestjournal

User avatar
Ozymandias
Posts:1901
Joined:Sun Jun 20, 2004 3:21 pm

Postby Ozymandias » Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:18 pm

100% is quite easy - its called a lead (or a leash, if u really want)
The end is nigh!

Softpaw
Posts:1348
Joined:Sun Oct 05, 2003 6:42 pm
Location:Washington, DC
Contact:

Postby Softpaw » Fri Aug 06, 2004 3:41 am

Leashes are fun!<br><br>[shifty eyes] Why's everyone looking at me like that...?

User avatar
VisibilityMissing
Posts:1278
Joined:Mon Jun 14, 2004 8:31 pm
Location:Oak Park, near Chicago, Illinois

Postby VisibilityMissing » Fri Aug 06, 2004 5:31 am

Must . . . get . . . picture . . . out . . . of . . . head!!!!!<br><br>AAAAAUUUUGHHHHHH!!!<br><br>
"The beauty of this is that it is only of theoretical importance,
and there is no way it can be of any practical use whatsoever."
- Sidney Harris


"Perhaps they've discovered the giant whoopee cushion I hid
under the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge." http://ozyandmillie.org/2002/01/03/ozy-and-millie-819/

User avatar
Gizensha
Posts:1753
Joined:Sun Feb 22, 2004 12:27 am
Location:Blackpool, UK
Contact:

Postby Gizensha » Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:34 am

<!--QuoteBegin-FelixLockhart+Aug 6 2004, 03:41 AM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (FelixLockhart @ Aug 6 2004, 03:41 AM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> Leashes are fun!<br><br>[shifty eyes] Why's everyone looking at me like that...? <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> Like what?<br><br>Seriously, this thread suddenly reminds me. Need to get a collar at some point.
SirQuirkyK: GSNN argued that Unanonemous is to sociologists what DoND is to statisticians
Gizensha Fox: ...Porn?
Livejournal, Greatestjournal

User avatar
Burning Sheep Productions
Posts:4175
Joined:Fri Oct 31, 2003 8:56 am
Location:Australia
Contact:

Postby Burning Sheep Productions » Fri Aug 06, 2004 8:03 am

Robots can "smell" things, they pick up the chemical makeup of the air around them and search for traces of drugs and bombs and stuff.<br>Saw one on an NCIS episode.
Image
Burning Sheep Productions


Return to “Anything”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 140 guests