Then you must be eitherYou can stop right there, I'm a Christian believe in all of them. :p
a)not devout enough
b)smarter (or at least less conservative) than the average Christian.
Moderator:Æron
vocal Christian. There is a huge difference between the opinions of Televangelists and the opinions of... Every Christian I've met.Then you must be eitherYou can stop right there, I'm a Christian believe in all of them. :p
a)not devout enough
b)smarter (or at least less conservative) than the average Christian.
Livejournal, GreatestjournalSirQuirkyK: GSNN argued that Unanonemous is to sociologists what DoND is to statisticians
Gizensha Fox: ...Porn?
I didn't mean what I said in a retaliatory way, I just wondered if that particular comment was from a Christian point of view.yeah, I did mean continuation of Judaism, and yes I am coming from a Christian viewpoint (take that as you will).
INFIDEL!!Except Willy Wonka. Everyone knows that's just a dumb theory.
Actually Muslims place more significance on Jesus than that. The Koran mentions him several times and even uses some of the Biblical stories if I remember correctly. They believe him to be a divinely inspired prophet and also believe in his resurrection at judgement day to fulfill his promise of a second coming. I'm a little sketchy about what happens next, if I'm not mistaken (I'm writing this part without checking my facts) according to the Muslim version Jesus then speaks against Christianity and tells the people to convert to Islam.Fist, Islamists (or Muslims) believe in God (whom they call Allah) and believe that Jesus was a prophet and a good teacher, but of course don't believe in his resurrection.
Um, yes, that's what I meant.vocal Christian. There is a huge difference between the opinions of Televangelists and the opinions of... Every Christian I've met.Then you must be eitherYou can stop right there, I'm a Christian believe in all of them. :p
a)not devout enough
b)smarter (or at least less conservative) than the average Christian.
People like Pat Robertson seem to me to exist solely to give the Christian right a bad name.Most Christians I've met believe in a loving, forgivng God rather than the "Do as I say or go to HELL!" sort that are presented by the Televangelists.
I think that they're here to test the faith of Christians. Somewhere in the Bible (don't know where yet, I'm only up to the middle of Isaiah) Christians are warned about false prophets claiming to represent Christ, but actually working for evil. Don't know if it mentions whether they will think they're working for Christ, though.People like Pat Robertson seem to me to exist solely to give the Christian right a bad name.
um... sorry my little cousin was here a little while ago and some1 said he had a buddah belly...Have you seen Ozy? He's the anti-Buddah. He's a stick figure.![]()
BUDDAH BELLY!
![]()
The anti-christ is meant to be a devout christian, iirc.I think that they're here to test the faith of Christians. Somewhere in the Bible (don't know where yet, I'm only up to the middle of Isaiah) Christians are warned about false prophets claiming to represent Christ, but actually working for evil. Don't know if it mentions whether they will think they're working for Christ, though.People like Pat Robertson seem to me to exist solely to give the Christian right a bad name.
Livejournal, GreatestjournalSirQuirkyK: GSNN argued that Unanonemous is to sociologists what DoND is to statisticians
Gizensha Fox: ...Porn?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests