Millie's Belly Button
Moderator:Æron
-
- Posts:1366
- Joined:Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:38 am
- Bocaj Claw
- Posts:8523
- Joined:Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:31 am
- Location:Not Stetson University
- Contact:
-
- Posts:4297
- Joined:Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:08 pm
- Location:On hiatus
- Contact:
No, it wouldn't be that either. <!--emo&:P--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... tongue.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tongue.gif' /><!--endemo-->
- Tom Flapwell
- Posts:5465
- Joined:Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:48 pm
- Location:DC
- Contact:
Only today did I notice that Ms. Sorkowitz had called Felicia's report "very adequate." Those are the same words used by a snob in "Zits" to compliment Jeremy's paper, which she expected to get a C. If Ms. Sorkowitz is having trouble complimenting other reports, maybe Millie will get lucky with a curve.
See other much-maligned creatures in my webcomic: http://downscale.comicgenesis.com
-
- Posts:1366
- Joined:Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:38 am
very adequate is not redundant. If somethign reaches a certian level it is adequate. Very is an adverb meanign mroe so. While it may not make sence thatone somethng reaches a certian point that it cannot reach that point any more the term aplies lieks ayign a number is very greater then 3 as oposed to mearly greater then 3. A better way to say this woudl be much greater then 3 but soemthign being much accurate dosnt; make any sence.<br><br>Verry adiquate goes mroe then sayign mearly adiquate because it is does mroe then what it woudl take to be mearly adiquate.
Llewellyn for President 2008 <br><br><img><br><img>
- Bocaj Claw
- Posts:8523
- Joined:Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:31 am
- Location:Not Stetson University
- Contact:
I disagree. By saying "very adiquate" instead of just "adiquate" one says that it does more then justs meats the standards it goes beyond that. Not only did somebody do the job they did it better then what was required. By drawling the disticion that the thing beign complemented could be worse and still be good enough that there is soemthign of a good well meanign complement there.
Llewellyn for President 2008 <br><br><img><br><img>
- Bocaj Claw
- Posts:8523
- Joined:Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:31 am
- Location:Not Stetson University
- Contact:
- Caoimhin
- Posts:1063
- Joined:Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:14 pm
- Location:In the magical land of Jersey... Watch your step and don't trip on the cows.
I've just noticed that norsenerd has a lot of typos <!--emo&:blink:--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... /blink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='blink.gif' /><!--endemo--> .
- Bocaj Claw
- Posts:8523
- Joined:Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:31 am
- Location:Not Stetson University
- Contact:
I do have a lot of "typo's" They arn;t exaclt typo's... bah<br><br>Anyways I actully think "very adiquate" and "very acceptable" are both better complemetns then "good report". Not "excelent report"; that woudl be a better complement.<br><br>That's me though.
Llewellyn for President 2008 <br><br><img><br><img>
Except that she was refering to Felica:<br><br><img src='http://www.ozyandmillie.org/2005/om20051006.gif' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
Llewellyn for President 2008 <br><br><img><br><img>
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests