Politics explained
Moderator:Æron
So a Communist, a socialist, and a capitalist christian are asked who they would be if they could live as anyone from the New Testament.
They think for a bit, then the communist answers "I believe I would be Jesus, because he distributed his sermons equally to all people."
The socialist says "I would also be Jesus, as he took the power from the corrupt temple officials and gave it to the masses."
The capitalist thinks a bit more, then replies "I'd be the cross-maker."
They think for a bit, then the communist answers "I believe I would be Jesus, because he distributed his sermons equally to all people."
The socialist says "I would also be Jesus, as he took the power from the corrupt temple officials and gave it to the masses."
The capitalist thinks a bit more, then replies "I'd be the cross-maker."

Asuna Kagurazaka, Negima Magister Nyoro~nEgi Magi
- bad ass antelope
- Posts:233
- Joined:Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:24 pm
that was my point...Anarchy is Communism without the government.EXCUSE ME BUT PURE ANARCHY WOULD ACTUALLY BE THE SAME AS PURE COMMUNISM.
Get it right, foo.
the example used for "Pure Communism" could be used for the example of "Pure Anarchy" and be correct.
I like watching porn of Doog...
Liz
Shut the fuuuuuck upGo away, please...
It could. But the word Anarchy is vague. We could be talking Bakunin style anarchy, or Thunderdome style.that was my point...Anarchy is Communism without the government.EXCUSE ME BUT PURE ANARCHY WOULD ACTUALLY BE THE SAME AS PURE COMMUNISM.
Get it right, foo.
the example used for "Pure Communism" could be used for the example of "Pure Anarchy" and be correct.

- bad ass antelope
- Posts:233
- Joined:Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:24 pm
But the problem here again is what ideal?I assumed that "pure" meant "idealist"
Communism is communism is communism. It's fairly well defined. Anarchy just means "lack of government." Different people have different ideals on what should take the place of government, but they all qualify as "Anarchy."

- bad ass antelope
- Posts:233
- Joined:Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:24 pm
I know what you meant by it, I'm just saying that "Pure Anarchy" doesn't necessarily mean what you said in the above quote. It could, but then it also could not.an ideal anarchy would be one where people are getting along. an ideal anarchy would be one where, all forms of [peaceful] anarchy would be capable of coexisting peacefully, as well as [peaceful] governments as well

-
- Posts:2055
- Joined:Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:57 pm
- Location:Two Days To Last Thursday
Pure Anarchy, in the ideal sense, is spontaneous order.I know what you meant by it, I'm just saying that "Pure Anarchy" doesn't necessarily mean what you said in the above quote. It could, but then it also could not.an ideal anarchy would be one where people are getting along. an ideal anarchy would be one where, all forms of [peaceful] anarchy would be capable of coexisting peacefully, as well as [peaceful] governments as well

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 163 guests