Happy 6010th birthday Universe

A place to talk about anything (that doesn't belong in the other forums).

Moderator:Æron

User avatar
Muninn
Moderator (retired)
Posts:7309
Joined:Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:22 pm
Happy 6010th birthday Universe

Postby Muninn » Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:56 pm

According to the Ussher-Lightfoot theory the universe was created today (23rd October) back in 4004 BC.

So happy birthday universe!

Llewthepoet
Posts:1676
Joined:Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:14 am

Postby Llewthepoet » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:06 pm

YAY! :o

User avatar
Muninn
Moderator (retired)
Posts:7309
Joined:Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:22 pm

Postby Muninn » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:34 pm

I wonder what would happen to Sumerian, Egyptian, Indus Valley and Chinese civilisations if this were true?

User avatar
Blue Blur
Posts:593
Joined:Sun Aug 21, 2005 9:25 pm
Location:Your hard drive
Contact:

Postby Blue Blur » Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:00 pm

It's them moles, I tell you! Them moles!
I'm here, you just can't see me!

Triggerpoint is my not so new webcomic, and currently under heavy work before it resurfaces.

User avatar
Tabris_The_17th
Posts:2276
Joined:Sat May 06, 2006 5:31 am
Location:Crestfallen
Contact:

Postby Tabris_The_17th » Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:12 am

What's up with the four years? Couldn't we get an even 4000 BC?
Image
www.aiacrowd.com- Now updating every Tuesday and Friday!
"Like a post modern Peanuts with cat eared girls...kinda"

User avatar
likeafox
Administrator
Posts:1841
Joined:Sat Oct 18, 2003 10:32 pm
Location:Canada
Contact:

Postby likeafox » Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:22 am

What's up with the four years? Couldn't we get an even 4000 BC?
Hey you're lucky it's even based on Earth years and not Jupiter or Alpha Centauri 1. :-P

User avatar
Tom Flapwell
Posts:5465
Joined:Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:48 pm
Location:DC
Contact:

Postby Tom Flapwell » Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:09 pm

The four-year discrepancy comes from a modern suspicion that Jesus was born four years earlier than previously thought. I think it has to do with the reign of one of the Herods.

User avatar
Steve the Pocket
Posts:2271
Joined:Wed May 19, 2004 10:04 pm

Postby Steve the Pocket » Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:52 pm

Correct. Herod the Great died in 4 BC. Although his son was also named Herod; I'm not sure where they got the idea he couldn't have been the one Matthew was talking about. I'll have to ask my prof.

Holyman83
Posts:3443
Joined:Mon Jul 19, 2004 2:49 am
Location:A bluish sphere in space orbiting a star in the Milky Way
Contact:

Postby Holyman83 » Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:37 pm

yay, happy birthday Universe!
Image

User avatar
Bocaj Claw
Posts:8523
Joined:Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:31 am
Location:Not Stetson University
Contact:

Postby Bocaj Claw » Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:26 am

Of course! And all the evidence to the contrary is just the result of stress affecting the aging process! :D
That which does not kill me, cripples me for life.

Image

My deviantART account

User avatar
Doc Sigma
Posts:3726
Joined:Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:52 am
Location:Boston
Contact:

Postby Doc Sigma » Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:45 pm

Herod the Great died in 4 BC. Although his son was also named Herod
I think they called him Herod the Marginally Acceptable.

User avatar
Muninn
Moderator (retired)
Posts:7309
Joined:Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:22 pm

Postby Muninn » Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:57 pm

It may be that but I remember reading that they got the age through the ages of an unbroken line of lineage listed in the Old Testament, measuring the ages of people like Solomon and Noah, their descendants and ancestors, all the way back to Adam. But it's been sometime since I read it, I might be wrong.

User avatar
Steve the Pocket
Posts:2271
Joined:Wed May 19, 2004 10:04 pm

Postby Steve the Pocket » Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:54 pm

OK, I got the Herod thing figured out; it was in my text the whole time. Herod the Great had three sons: Herod Antipas, Herod Philip, and Archelaus. Each ruled over a part of their late father's domain, with present-day Palestine going to Archelaus, not one of the Herods. So that solves that.

Plus, apparently other historical documents reveal that slaughtering all the infants in a town is more or less the kind of thing Herod the Great would do: he killed two of his wives and at least three of his sons. Because he, in an attempt to look "politically correct" in front of his Jewish subjects, did not eat pork, Caesar Augustus once remarked that it was better to be Herod's pig than his son.

User avatar
Tom Flapwell
Posts:5465
Joined:Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:48 pm
Location:DC
Contact:

Postby Tom Flapwell » Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:05 am

Yeah, I had read that mass infanticide went with Herod the Great's personality, which would explain why so few sources covered the one incident. I did not know the other details, so thanks, Octan.


Return to “Anything”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests