Time: 01:02:03 04-05-06
Moderator:Æron
I forgot to mention this before, but we seem to have dodged an end of the world bullet. If you didn't notice, yesterday at 1:02AM and three seconds, the exact date read 01:02:03 04-05-06.
I'm not sure where, but I heard somehting about this being significant. Looking around, it seems whoever it was was wrong.
I'm not sure where, but I heard somehting about this being significant. Looking around, it seems whoever it was was wrong.


-
- Posts:287
- Joined:Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:23 pm
- Location:Mineapolis, MN, Rift-Earth
- Contact:
There's a difference between potentially significant and significant. The reason that 01:02:03 04-05-06 is potentially significant, of course, is that it's a fairly obvious point of time to set a time-released virus to.
Another potentially significant point in time this year will be 06:06:06 06/06/06
Of course, as any Brit knows, we're not at 01:02:03 04/05/06 yet. That occurs on the fourth of may. you were actually dealing with 01:02:03 05/04/06
Another potentially significant point in time this year will be 06:06:06 06/06/06
Of course, as any Brit knows, we're not at 01:02:03 04/05/06 yet. That occurs on the fourth of may. you were actually dealing with 01:02:03 05/04/06
Livejournal, GreatestjournalSirQuirkyK: GSNN argued that Unanonemous is to sociologists what DoND is to statisticians
Gizensha Fox: ...Porn?
-
- Posts:4297
- Joined:Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:08 pm
- Location:On hiatus
- Contact:
- Todd McCloud
- Posts:86
- Joined:Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:11 am
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests