Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2003 8:02 pm
Hi all<br><br>I was wondering if there has been any thought of limiting the size of signatures on the forum. The reason I mention this is I can't stand reading threads where 80% of the screen real estate is filled with signatures and icons and images, and the actual content of the thread barely manages to fill up 20%. It makes it really hard to keep track of the thread if the signatures are too long, and most of the time, most of the content really belongs in profiles anyway.<br><br>Consider the difference in readibility between the following blocks<br><br>=====================================================================================<br><br><b>[LotharBot]</b> Hey, O&M really rocks!<br>- LotharBot<br> www.zometool.com<br><br><b>[Joe Schmoe]</b> Yeah, I agree, it's a great comic!<br>- Joe<br> "Great is the power of steady misinterpretation" - Darwin<br><br><b>[Random Fan]</b> Definitely! My favorite is "define cynical".<br>- Random (insert small image here...<br> .<br> . end of image.....)<br><br><b>[Millie]</b> Yeah!<br>- Millie, president of the<a href="http://www.slashdot.org">legion of confusion</a><br><br>=====================================================================================<br><br><b>[LotharBot]</b> Hey, O&M really rocks!<br>- LotharBot<br>My block of geek code: *ALK+++LKJ--SH+++GEKJHKG+++++++SKLJ:^^--QEWE++++<br>My computer specs: pentium-200<br> 2 megs of RAM<br> 80000 gig hard drive<br> 2x CD-ROM drive<br> Broken joystick<br>My favorite links:<br> www.cnn.com<br> www.ozyandmillie.org<br> www.espn.com<br> www.washington.edu<br> www.reallifecomics.com<br> www.zometool.com<br> www.tomandcatherine.com<br><br><b>[Joe Schmoe]</b> Yeah, I agree, it's a great comic!<br><br> ( many extraneous blank lines )<br>.<br>.<br>.<br>.<br>.<br> ( end of extraneous blank lines )<br><br>- Joe Schmoe<br><br> www.ozyandmillie.org<br><br> "Great is the power of steady misinterpretation" - Darwin<br><br> "All you need is love" - the Beatles<br><br><b>[Random Fan]</b> Definitely! My favorite is "define cynical".<br><br>- Random Fan<br>aka RF<br>aka Random Guy<br>aka Mike<br>aka Michael<br><br> (insert way-too-big image here .................................<br> .<br> .<br> .<br> .<br> .<br> .<br> .<br> .<br> .<br> .<br> .<br> .<br> ......................................... all the way down to here, and then some)<br><br><b>[Millie]</b> Yeah!<br><br>- Millie, supreme uber-commander of the Legion of Confusion!<br>Join the legion of confusion: click <a href="http://www.slashdot.org">here</a><br>Rules for the legion of confusion<br>1) you must be good at confusing people<br>2) ouyay ustmay eakspay igpay atinlay<br>3) sdrawkcab epyt ot elba eb tsum uoy<br>4) you must not be confused by any of our rules<br>5) bargle nawdle zauf<br><br>=====================================================================================<br><br>The actual useful content between the two was the same, but in the first, it was actually easy to find... and 90% of the stuff in the signatures in the second was just plain useless. For the most part, the short signatures express almost as much as the long ones do.<br><br>My own personal preference is to limit signatures to, say, 5-6 lines including blanks, or an image no taller than 100 pixels and no wider than 600 (for those running in low res.) Anything bigger than that really belongs in your profile, or in your "hi I'm new here" post. Any thoughts? Am I just off my rocker? ;)<br><br>-Tom aka LotharBot<br><br>P.S. yeah, I know, I'm new here -- who am I to critize the established order? Well, Millie is my hero :D