Turkey Mobilises against Kurds
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:40 pm
"Turkey has deployed up to 100,000 soldiers, backed by tanks, fighter jets and helicopters, along the border."
I was once told, by a history teacher, who pointed out that the Russians were technically at war with Germany months before a shot was fired between the two (during the Great War) that declaring war isn't a problem for anyone. They're just words. So what? No, it's when you mobilise that things begin to get serious.
If you didn't hear about it outside of Europe, then I think you should know about this. Turkey, which has the second largest army in NATO, lost 20 troops recently (12 killed and 8 missing) in the south-eastern corner of Turkey which has a large Kurdish population. The main suspects are the PKK, a group designated terrorists by the US and Turkey (among others). The PKK would ideally like to see a Kurdish state, as the Kurds (roughly 13m of them) are the largest ethnic group without a state. Tensions between the PKK and Turkey have been straining since the 1970s.
The real issue is that, as you may or may not know, Turkey borders Iraq on the south-eastern border. The North-West of Iraq is under Kurdish control, and as yet is the only area to experience real stability. Since Turkey have lined forces up on the border between themselves and Kurdish Iraq, it seems that Turkey are intending to move further into Iraq and root out the PKK, who the Turks believe are being sheltered by the Kurdish rulers.
Problems arise when you try to work out whose side anyone is on, and also when you look at parallels in the region. Since Turkey is a member of NATO, it is protected by Article 5, which states that any attack against a member state is an attack against all member states. That's why we're all in Afghanistan. But Iraq is run by (okay I may be paraphrasing, but you could also call it "strongly backed by") the US. And the US and Turkey are meant to be on the same side. So what if Turkey invades an area under US-backed rule?
And if Turkey *does* move in to 'weed out terrorists', Bush will have a carte blanche to move into Iran, since he accuses them of pretty much the same thing as the Turks are of the Kurds.
I'm worried by all this that's going on in the Middle East. It's not like the region needs any more trouble.
I was once told, by a history teacher, who pointed out that the Russians were technically at war with Germany months before a shot was fired between the two (during the Great War) that declaring war isn't a problem for anyone. They're just words. So what? No, it's when you mobilise that things begin to get serious.
If you didn't hear about it outside of Europe, then I think you should know about this. Turkey, which has the second largest army in NATO, lost 20 troops recently (12 killed and 8 missing) in the south-eastern corner of Turkey which has a large Kurdish population. The main suspects are the PKK, a group designated terrorists by the US and Turkey (among others). The PKK would ideally like to see a Kurdish state, as the Kurds (roughly 13m of them) are the largest ethnic group without a state. Tensions between the PKK and Turkey have been straining since the 1970s.
The real issue is that, as you may or may not know, Turkey borders Iraq on the south-eastern border. The North-West of Iraq is under Kurdish control, and as yet is the only area to experience real stability. Since Turkey have lined forces up on the border between themselves and Kurdish Iraq, it seems that Turkey are intending to move further into Iraq and root out the PKK, who the Turks believe are being sheltered by the Kurdish rulers.
Problems arise when you try to work out whose side anyone is on, and also when you look at parallels in the region. Since Turkey is a member of NATO, it is protected by Article 5, which states that any attack against a member state is an attack against all member states. That's why we're all in Afghanistan. But Iraq is run by (okay I may be paraphrasing, but you could also call it "strongly backed by") the US. And the US and Turkey are meant to be on the same side. So what if Turkey invades an area under US-backed rule?
And if Turkey *does* move in to 'weed out terrorists', Bush will have a carte blanche to move into Iran, since he accuses them of pretty much the same thing as the Turks are of the Kurds.
I'm worried by all this that's going on in the Middle East. It's not like the region needs any more trouble.