New law

[Blue Blur]

Yes, <a href='http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyan ... &subj=news' target='_blank'>this</a> is real. No, I don't have a comment...

[Softpaw]

Yeah, I saw that on <a href='http://www.dslreports.com' target='_blank'>DSL Reports</a> today, pretty pathetic.

[Holyman83]

lol, and how do they plan to enforce it?

[Blue Blur]

They can't. It's that stupid.

[CoreyFox]

*sigh* I'm done for. I have a disability, so i often say stuff i might regret later.

[Miles E Traysandor]

Fake Proaganda. If there is such a law, show me physical proof. Until then, I won't trust in some unrelaible source about a law that would require an act of God to enforce. 'Nuff said.

[Dr. Doog]

wtf haha and yet old women on eBay that are the equivalent of a troll to people like my mom selling dolls on eBay are home free.

[Blue Blur]

What? I'm sorry, but I just did not understand what you said.

[likeafox]

I'm reporting you all to the president for annoying me.

[Richard K Niner]

<a href='http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c ... IWu:e91030:' target='_blank'>The relevant section</a>, and <a href='http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html ... -000-.html' target='_blank'>the law that is amended</a><br><br>Personally, I think this is more of an over-reaction than anything else. The excerpt in the article is clearly modified to omit any reference to "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or indecent". Frankly, I don't see any major problem with it. You still have to cross the line to be penailzed.

[Bocaj Claw]

Oh for the love of all things that can be used as an expletive!<br><br>The US doesn't own the Internet! Doesn't this violate free speech in some way?<br><br>Wonder how this fits in with the bill:<br><br>"You're presenting an opinion that differs from mine. You are annoying me. I demand your full name, address, and list of all previous criminal convictions."<br><br>Edit: Oops. Sim post.

[Steve the Pocket]

Welp, I guess <a href='http://www.weebls-stuff.com/toons/annoying/' target='_blank'>the guys at Weebls-Stuff are screwed then</a>.

[DesertFoxCat]

Other than stating my dislike for the USA's insane protection of the freedom of speech, all I can say is <!--emo&:huh:--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... ns/huh.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='huh.gif' /><!--endemo-->

[Joe3210]

Does this mean that we can turn Redie(can't spell) in for being a long winded pest?

[Tom Flapwell]

<!--QuoteBegin-Blue Blur+Jan 10 2006, 02:18 AM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Blue Blur @ Jan 10 2006, 02:18 AM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> What? I'm sorry, but I just did not understand what you said. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> I believe DooG was saying that his mom gets annoyed by old women who sell dolls on eBay (not sure what makes them troll-like), but in spite of her annoyance, the law would not prosecute them.