Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 3:36 am
by Jerry Roosevelt
<a href='
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4592541.stm' target='_blank'>BBC link</a><br><br>1) Good for the marchers. They deserve full rights.<br><br>2) Odd that a respected news source used the term 'drag queen'. Does that mean it's the normal phrase to use?
Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 5:00 pm
by Tom Flapwell
I'm not sure what other term there is for one exactly. "Transvestite" and "transsexual" have other connotations.
Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 7:53 pm
by Jerry Roosevelt
<!--QuoteBegin-Tom Flapwell+May 30 2005, 01:00 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Tom Flapwell @ May 30 2005, 01:00 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> I'm not sure what other term there is for one exactly. "Transvestite" and "transsexual" have other connotations. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> True, but 'drag queen' seems so informal.
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 3:06 am
by Ibun
It depends, are they weirdo transvestites, action transvestites, or executive transvetites.<br><br>EDIT: Bonus points to anyone who gets the reference. <!--emo&:P--><img src='
http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... tongue.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tongue.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 4:15 am
by Arloest
I GET IT.
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 1:12 pm
by Rooster
My rule is that I won't laugh at someone for being gay. <br><br>But being camp? C'mon, that's hillarious!
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 1:20 pm
by Tom Flapwell
It occurs to me that the title of the thread could imply a march for the rights of big giant gays.
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2005 5:53 pm
by Muninn
That's actually what I thought of when I first read it.
