Page 1 of 4
Posted: Wed May 05, 2004 8:09 pm
by ShadOtterdan
One thing I just noticed is that despite the fact that many people in the strip have commented on Ozy's lack of pants, noone seems to notice that millie goes around without a shirt most of the time.
Posted: Wed May 05, 2004 8:30 pm
by Henohenomoheji
I noticed... It's just that it's not as big a deal because the lack of pants is funny and the lack of shirts is not. I mean, which can you think of better? a "no-shirt" joke or a "no-pants" joke.<br><br>at least this is what I think.
Posted: Wed May 05, 2004 8:31 pm
by Doctor Fred
Wouldn't the overalls count as, like, half a shirt?
Posted: Wed May 05, 2004 8:33 pm
by norsenerd
The overals basicly act like a shirt. It's basicly only missing sleaves.
Posted: Wed May 05, 2004 8:34 pm
by Zaaphod
Well, Millie wears overalls, so that sort-of counts as a shirt.<br><br>No one comments about Felicia running around topless or Timulty running around naked either.<br>
Posted: Wed May 05, 2004 8:35 pm
by Henohenomoheji
wanna know what I just noticed?<br><br>this thread was postless for about 5 seconds.<br><br>okay, I was exaggerating, but still.<br><br>People! yay.
Posted: Wed May 05, 2004 10:26 pm
by Zylo
It's one of the funny quirks of furryness. As realism declines, so does the need for clothes.<br><br>Now there is a realism cut-off point at which clothes become...a bit more requisite. But O&M is enough of a toon that, well, small little raccoon children run around naked and it doesn't matter.
Posted: Wed May 05, 2004 10:34 pm
by Tavis
Of course, no one seems to care about wearing socks, even though it still appears as though it's normal to have them. At least they all still have a good appreciation for t-shirts.
Posted: Wed May 05, 2004 11:31 pm
by Sabre
I dont blame em'.. with all that fur.. clothes must be hot.
Posted: Wed May 05, 2004 11:37 pm
by Henohenomoheji
socks are funny.
Posted: Thu May 06, 2004 8:04 am
by Softpaw
Furriness does create those paradoxes. I mean, <a href='
http://fusiontechva.net/softpaw/furpics/softpaw-nyx.jpg' target='_blank'>this handsome gentleman</a> looks perfectly fine with no clothes on.
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 12:03 pm
by Burning Sheep Productions
Gawd, I en't good at translating artwork am I?<br>I thought the guy was a gal.
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 6:08 pm
by Northern_l33tness
Yes, furriness does create paradoxes. I remember participating in a conversation on the Redwall Fanfiction Board a few years back about the lack of clothing on some characters in the Redwall TV series. I seem to remember a lot of the late part of that discussion concentrated on dirty jokes about the show's creators.<br><br>I haven't read all of the Ozy and Millie strips, but I actually can't remember when the nudity of any character a big issue in the series. I think that was probably intentional on DCS's part.
Posted: Sat May 08, 2004 1:47 am
by Zylo
There was the "strip poker" comic, as well as the "no shirt, no shoes, no service" comic. I'm too lazy to find them. But they're there.
Posted: Tue May 11, 2004 6:13 pm
by Muninn
It's going to hinder your appreciation if you think why they're not wearing clothes.