Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"

Revisiting old Ozy & Millie comics.

Moderator:Æron

NonsenseWords
Posts:871
Joined:Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:25 pm
Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"

Postby NonsenseWords » Thu Dec 23, 2010 4:17 pm

Image

...really, DCS? Lampshading a blatant reference does not make it any less blatant.

User avatar
Maggot Brain
Posts:535
Joined:Fri Jul 24, 2009 3:12 am
Location:In a van...down by the river

Re: Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"

Postby Maggot Brain » Fri Dec 24, 2010 12:52 am

This doesn't exist. Move on.

Cactus Jack
Posts:726
Joined:Tue May 12, 2009 3:34 pm

Re: Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"

Postby Cactus Jack » Fri Dec 24, 2010 2:16 am

Lets just pretend this one doesn't exist.

User avatar
Trance
Posts:517
Joined:Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:58 pm
Location:Aisle 8, Paper Products
Contact:

Re: Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"

Postby Trance » Fri Dec 24, 2010 2:18 am

ugh

User avatar
Muninn
Moderator (retired)
Posts:7309
Joined:Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:22 pm

Re: Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"

Postby Muninn » Fri Dec 24, 2010 6:10 pm

What's exactly the problem with this?

This was the very first Ozy and Millie strip I saw, in the tributes section of a Calvin and Hobbes site.

NonsenseWords
Posts:871
Joined:Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:25 pm

Re: Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"

Postby NonsenseWords » Sat Dec 25, 2010 3:57 am

My personal problem is the Trying Too Hard syndrome that DCS has whenever he tries to do 'wacky'; he pulls random words out of the air and strings them together and expects comedy gold, without quite recognizing why they worked in something like Calvin & Hobbes.

Calvinball, for instance, had its own internal logic; little kid logic (Calvin logic, anyway), but you could follow it step by step, and the visuals on the comic had a dynamism and energy to supplement it that this one does not have. This is static, both in terms of the rules (as Isolde just kind of announces "now roll the duct tape") and in terms of the artwork (with everybody just standing around instead of actively playing), and feels flat and lifeless in comparison. It has interesting imagery, but... well, as I said, it's simply trying too hard, and misses the heart of what made the imaginary sport it's cribbing from so much fun to read.

In my opinion, anyhow.

User avatar
Maggot Brain
Posts:535
Joined:Fri Jul 24, 2009 3:12 am
Location:In a van...down by the river

Re: Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"

Postby Maggot Brain » Sat Dec 25, 2010 4:33 am

My personal problem is the Trying Too Hard syndrome that DCS has whenever he tries to do 'wacky'; he pulls random words out of the air and strings them together and expects comedy gold, without quite recognizing why they worked in something like Calvin & Hobbes.

Calvinball, for instance, had its own internal logic; little kid logic (Calvin logic, anyway), but you could follow it step by step, and the visuals on the comic had a dynamism and energy to supplement it that this one does not have. This is static, both in terms of the rules (as Isolde just kind of announces "now roll the duct tape") and in terms of the artwork (with everybody just standing around instead of actively playing), and feels flat and lifeless in comparison. It has interesting imagery, but... well, as I said, it's simply trying too hard, and misses the heart of what made the imaginary sport it's cribbing from so much fun to read.

In my opinion, anyhow.
No. It's just not funny.

Cactus Jack
Posts:726
Joined:Tue May 12, 2009 3:34 pm

Re: Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"

Postby Cactus Jack » Tue Dec 28, 2010 12:15 am

What's exactly the problem with this?

This was the very first Ozy and Millie strip I saw, in the tributes section of a Calvin and Hobbes site.

There's a tribute and then there's a shameless rip off, and in the context of posting the comics here we've seen way too many comics bordering on rip off for DCS to get a pass on such a clunky tribute.


Return to “The O&M Archaeological Committee”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests