Page 1 of 1
Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 4:17 pm
by NonsenseWords
...really, DCS? Lampshading a blatant reference does not make it any less blatant.
Re: Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 12:52 am
by Maggot Brain
This doesn't exist. Move on.
Re: Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 2:16 am
by Cactus Jack
Lets just pretend this one doesn't exist.
Re: Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 2:18 am
by Trance
ugh
Re: Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 6:10 pm
by Muninn
What's exactly the problem with this?
This was the very first Ozy and Millie strip I saw, in the tributes section of a Calvin and Hobbes site.
Re: Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 3:57 am
by NonsenseWords
My personal problem is the Trying Too Hard syndrome that DCS has whenever he tries to do 'wacky'; he pulls random words out of the air and strings them together and expects comedy gold, without quite recognizing why they worked in something like Calvin & Hobbes.
Calvinball, for instance, had its own internal logic; little kid logic (Calvin logic, anyway), but you could follow it step by step, and the visuals on the comic had a dynamism and energy to supplement it that this one does not have. This is static, both in terms of the rules (as Isolde just kind of announces "now roll the duct tape") and in terms of the artwork (with everybody just standing around instead of actively playing), and feels flat and lifeless in comparison. It has interesting imagery, but... well, as I said, it's simply trying too hard, and misses the heart of what made the imaginary sport it's cribbing from so much fun to read.
In my opinion, anyhow.
Re: Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 4:33 am
by Maggot Brain
My personal problem is the Trying Too Hard syndrome that DCS has whenever he tries to do 'wacky'; he pulls random words out of the air and strings them together and expects comedy gold, without quite recognizing why they worked in something like Calvin & Hobbes.
Calvinball, for instance, had its own internal logic; little kid logic (Calvin logic, anyway), but you could follow it step by step, and the visuals on the comic had a dynamism and energy to supplement it that this one does not have. This is static, both in terms of the rules (as Isolde just kind of announces "now roll the duct tape") and in terms of the artwork (with everybody just standing around instead of actively playing), and feels flat and lifeless in comparison. It has interesting imagery, but... well, as I said, it's simply trying too hard, and misses the heart of what made the imaginary sport it's cribbing from so much fun to read.
In my opinion, anyhow.
No. It's just not funny.
Re: Thursday, July 13, 2000: Nothing like "Calvinball"
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 12:15 am
by Cactus Jack
What's exactly the problem with this?
This was the very first Ozy and Millie strip I saw, in the tributes section of a Calvin and Hobbes site.
There's a tribute and then there's a shameless rip off, and in the context of posting the comics here we've seen way too many comics bordering on rip off for DCS to get a pass on such a clunky tribute.