Page 2 of 2

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2004 5:22 pm
by hdofu
I think some liberals need to grow up. <!--emo&<_<--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... ns/dry.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='dry.gif' /><!--endemo--> that's just my thoughts.

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:40 pm
by Tavis
<!--QuoteBegin-penguinita+Nov 19 2004, 02:15 AM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (penguinita @ Nov 19 2004, 02:15 AM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> since this is primarily a poilitcal strip, should it be in world events?<br><br>and that's all i'm gonna say on this topic <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> I was unsure if this thing would have a worldwide scope at the time. Apparently because it is based on current events and involve stuff on the global scale (the apologies of some people to the world), it deserves to be moved.<br><br>This is not because of its political nature, but it's current events and worldly one. Just so we're clear.

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 2:58 am
by Sakie
Man... I need some Pringles

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:49 pm
by Ankaris
*Hands DD a can, opens it, an ad starts around them*<br><br> <!--emo&:blink:--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... /blink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='blink.gif' /><!--endemo-->

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 11:32 pm
by Henohenomoheji
Edit: whoops, wrong thread. Sorry!<br><br>

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 8:20 am
by Kles
<!--emo&:D--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... iggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif' /><!--endemo-->, how'd you manage that one, Henoheno?

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 2:40 pm
by Supersmoke
People whine. People are spoiled tards. I got over Bush being re-elected. Because I can accept that fact that our country is screwed.

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 4:06 am
by Steve the Pocket
Anyway, would you guys rather they be aplologizing or still ranting?<br><br>I have to think they're taking it rather well, considering.

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 6:46 am
by Ruedii-X
I personally think that both presidential canidates were pretty lowsy. Kerry wasn't up to taking a real stand on any issue, and Bush, well I think all the arguements have been presented EVERYWHERE.<br><br>Frankly, I don't think Kerry could have done much better in the war situations, as he would have caved in to political pressure to keep picking fights. We can't pull out of the fights we're in, as we've passed the point of no return, we're pretty much dead in the water no matter what we do. Either way, I found Kerry better for his health care plan, although he never was quite specific on his ecinomic strategy, and I can't place judgement on that.<br><br>If Kerry was the same man he was when he had the guts to stand up and addressing to his own country that they had done wrong in the Viatnam war, in the face of persicution for doing so, instead of going to a third party and making it an unneeded international comotion just to get defended by the rest of the world, I would trust him having the finger on the trigger, but he's changed since then.<br><br>However, I agree that we don't all agree with the overly millitant approche that George W. Bush uses. Many of us find it ironic that he is trying to force "freedom" on other countries by any mean other than political pressure. Many of us also find him corrupt and greedy.<br><br>Finally, just because we've lost faith in our canidates doesn't mean we shouldn't vote. It simply means we should choose the lesser of two evils (or choose apathy over ignorance as my choice was in this election.)

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 10:07 pm
by Gizensha
<!--QuoteBegin-Reudii-X+--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Reudii-X)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> If Kerry was the same man he was when he had the guts to stand up and addressing to his own country that they had done wrong in the Viatnam war, in the face of persicution for doing so, instead of going to a third party and making it an unneeded international comotion just to get defended by the rest of the world, I would trust him having the finger on the trigger, but he's changed since then.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br><br>Not quite sure what you mean here, since the US election is always a big international issue, I think in this latest case it has more effect on the UK for the next 4 years than what the next UK election will have on the UK for five years (give or take)<br><br>Neither of them would have made a good president, in my view. I do think that Kerry would have made a better one than Bush, however. Apparantly my political views match Kerry's at 59%, whereas Bush got 15% (not the lowest match, suprisingly). So, I wasn't going to be <b>happy</b> with either likely result. I'm just... Less happy with this one than I would have been with the other.<br><br>For the record, iirc, my views matched Codd's at a percentage in the high 70s, with Nader coming a close second in the mid 70s. Also for the record, I consider myself to be moderate <!--emo&^_^--><img src='http://definecynical.mancubus.net/forum ... /happy.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='happy.gif' /><!--endemo-->