Human Cloning
Moderator:Æron
<a href='http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3554474.stm' target='_blank'>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3554474.stm</a> <-- Now this is interesting. Certainly going to be pleasant to see the 'slippery slope' arguement against cloning put to the ultimate test. Which will potentially provide the ultimate counter arguement against the slippery slope arguement against various other things, such as euthanasia.
Livejournal, GreatestjournalSirQuirkyK: GSNN argued that Unanonemous is to sociologists what DoND is to statisticians
Gizensha Fox: ...Porn?
I want to see how things get when there's an obvious line and yet crossing it would also bring much-helpful benefits. There's a still a point to argue about 'when does an embryo become life? And, should 'potential to become a living organism' be valid? He he.
<i>Lilac: keeping the world sane - by comparison<br><br>"Call the men in white coats, this one's a keeper." -- Nall, SSSC<br>"Oh, how adorable. She's sleeping while flying! Why don't we put her hand in warm water and see what else she can do?" - Ruby, EB</i>
<!--QuoteBegin-Lilac+Aug 11 2004, 06:20 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Lilac @ Aug 11 2004, 06:20 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> I want to see how things get when there's an obvious line and yet crossing it would also bring much-helpful benefits. There's a still a point to argue about 'when does an embryo become life? And, should 'potential to become a living organism' be valid? He he. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> If 'potential to become a living organism' is counted as being life, then the Catholics are right that masterbation is genocide.<br><br>...Wow I've finally figured out how it's possable to argue that case.
Livejournal, GreatestjournalSirQuirkyK: GSNN argued that Unanonemous is to sociologists what DoND is to statisticians
Gizensha Fox: ...Porn?
Not quite. Potential here would be like 'without intervention'. Then again, could the embryo survive without some aid? .. Then again, isn't giving aid to a potential life a moral requirement?<br><br>And Giz, that view makes normal intercourse into 'genocide', too.
<i>Lilac: keeping the world sane - by comparison<br><br>"Call the men in white coats, this one's a keeper." -- Nall, SSSC<br>"Oh, how adorable. She's sleeping while flying! Why don't we put her hand in warm water and see what else she can do?" - Ruby, EB</i>
<!--QuoteBegin-Lilac+Aug 11 2004, 06:50 PM--> <table border='0' align='center' width='95%' ><tr><td class='quotetop'><b>Quote:</b> (Lilac @ Aug 11 2004, 06:50 PM)</td></tr><tr><td class='quotebody'> And Giz, that view makes normal intercourse into 'genocide', too. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table> <!--QuoteEEnd--><br> You think I didn't notice that when I first saw that viewpoint? Although, it could be argued that it's genocide to do things in a way that produces no way of producing a living organism, but 1 living organism > infinite potential organisms, I suppose
Livejournal, GreatestjournalSirQuirkyK: GSNN argued that Unanonemous is to sociologists what DoND is to statisticians
Gizensha Fox: ...Porn?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests