New character?

Discuss everything related to Ozy and Millie.
User avatar
paupal244
Posts:9
Joined:Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:27 pm
New character?

Postby paupal244 » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:45 pm

Yay, hooray, the black kitten is back. Good job :grin:

The MAZZTer
Posts:1150
Joined:Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:31 am
Location:Destiny, several billion light years from Earth. Also known as Vancouver.
Contact:

Postby The MAZZTer » Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:29 pm

Hit New Post instead of Reply? :X

Jelly
Posts:106
Joined:Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:05 am

Postby Jelly » Wed Dec 12, 2007 8:04 pm

I hope the black kitty stays.

User avatar
Dhokarena56
Posts:28
Joined:Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:14 am
Location:Under the sofa

Postby Dhokarena56 » Wed Dec 12, 2007 8:50 pm

DCS very well might develop him. But he could turn into another Locke, just sort of discussed from time to time but not too important anymore.
Anthrope! Me paideusete Homeron moi?

Jelly
Posts:106
Joined:Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:05 am

Postby Jelly » Wed Dec 12, 2007 9:49 pm

Ya true. Hey, is he the same one from before when Millie was trying to make Ozy have bad luck?

User avatar
Tom Flapwell
Posts:5465
Joined:Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:48 pm
Location:DC
Contact:

Postby Tom Flapwell » Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:36 pm

I'm not sure if Dhokarena was talking about Stevie or Mu-nan.
See other much-maligned creatures in my webcomic: http://downscale.comicgenesis.com

User avatar
Dhokarena56
Posts:28
Joined:Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:14 am
Location:Under the sofa

Postby Dhokarena56 » Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:49 pm

Actually, I would say that for both.
Anthrope! Me paideusete Homeron moi?

User avatar
Svix
Posts:282
Joined:Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:46 pm
Location:Coventry/York, U.K.
Contact:

Postby Svix » Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:08 pm

Hit New Post instead of Reply? :X
Relax, 71% of paupal's posts are new topics. :wink:

User avatar
Sage
Posts:2165
Joined:Wed May 16, 2007 10:38 pm
Location:Putting on the awesome hat
Contact:

Postby Sage » Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:30 pm

black kitty might become lyke Emily teh skunk
Image

User avatar
A dude named Vince
Posts:1143
Joined:Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:20 am
Location:If I told you, I'd have to kill you.

Postby A dude named Vince » Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:33 am

Ya true. Hey, is he the same one from before when Millie was trying to make Ozy have bad luck?
Most probaly.
Image
Like Shredder emerging from the ooze, I've returned for a while!
Gary's mod?
Image

Extreme-Speed
Posts:384
Joined:Sun Nov 11, 2007 10:51 pm

Postby Extreme-Speed » Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:51 am

Ya true. Hey, is he the same one from before when Millie was trying to make Ozy have bad luck?
Most probaly.
Yep.
Image

Jelly
Posts:106
Joined:Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:05 am

Postby Jelly » Thu Dec 13, 2007 6:01 am

Hit New Post instead of Reply? :X
Don't worry if you make a mistake like that you don't have to t ype stuff in the box you can just close the windown.

User avatar
Muninn
Moderator (retired)
Posts:7309
Joined:Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:22 pm

Postby Muninn » Thu Dec 13, 2007 11:11 am

Also moved this topic to the Ozy and Millie forum, Current Strips are for discussing the comics. :wink:

KJ Fellie
Posts:807
Joined:Thu Nov 29, 2007 12:38 pm
Location:Mars Academy
Contact:

Postby KJ Fellie » Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:53 pm

The black cat is Stevie. We have seen him before. I think he even wore the same shirt.

Also, the little puzzle in Extreme-Speed's signature:
To make this sentence true, the number of times we see 1 is _____, 2 is _____, 3 is _____, 4 is _____, and 5 is _____.
It can be answered with "one, one, one, one, and one," because if you spell it out, you only see "1" one time, "2" one time, "3" one time, "4" one time, and "5" one time. If you try to use the actual digits, it gets tricky.
Quoth the spotted fox: <b>*yerf*</b> :locke:
You usually
have to take what people say
with a grain of salt.
(or in cases like
mine, a shaker or two may
yield the best result.)

むらがあるフォックス
If you miss my old sigs...

User avatar
Doc Sigma
Posts:3726
Joined:Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:52 am
Location:Boston
Contact:

Postby Doc Sigma » Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:16 pm

Also, the little puzzle in Extreme-Speed's signature:
To make this sentence true, the number of times we see 1 is _____, 2 is _____, 3 is _____, 4 is _____, and 5 is _____.
It can be answered with "one, one, one, one, and one," because if you spell it out, you only see "1" one time, "2" one time, "3" one time, "4" one time, and "5" one time. If you try to use the actual digits, it gets tricky.
3, 2, 3, 1, 1. :) Wrote a dumb brute-force Perl script to solve it.

Code: Select all

my $n = 6; for my $one (1..$n) { for my $two (1..$n) { for my $three (1..$n) { for my $four (1..$n) { for my $five (1..$n) { my @t = (0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1); $t[$_] += 1 for (0, $one, $two, $three, $four, $five); if (($t[1] == $one) && ($t[2] == $two) && ($t[3] == $three) && ($t[4] == $four) && ($t[5] == $five)) { print "$one, $two, $three, $four, $five\n"; exit(0); } # if } # for } # for } # for } # for } # for print "Unsolvable for n(1,$n)\n"; exit(1);


Return to “Ozy and Millie”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests